[Info-vax] Assembly languages
Simon Clubley
clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Sat Apr 9 14:51:53 EDT 2022
On 2022-04-09, Bill Gunshannon <bill.gunshannon at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/9/22 00:31, Dave Froble wrote:
>>
>>
>> I doubt that many, if any, choose assembler because they like it. At
>> times it is the best choice. That appears to have decreased.
>>
Sometimes it is the only choice, but those cases are limited these days.
>
> I always like assembler. Have done some recently and expect to more
> in the near future. I know the assembler for at least 10 processors.
> But then, I am a dinosaur.
>
Assembly languages I've used in recent years: ARM, x86, MIPS, Macro-32,
and Alpha native assembly language.
Older assembly languages I knew at one time: Macro-11, Z80.
The above is not an exclusive list, but the point is that I am experienced
when it comes to assembly language.
And with that experience, I believe the time for assembly language is
well and truly past, unless it's needed for something specific such
as some inline assembly fragment to access a CPU-specific register
(for example), or really low-level stuff such as the initial interrupt
handling and dispatch the interrupt to a device driver stuff or other
such low-level work where not even C would be suitable.
Simon.
--
Simon Clubley, clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Walking destinations on a map are further away than they appear.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list