[Info-vax] Hobbyist licences for VAX
Jan-Erik Söderholm
jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com
Mon Apr 11 15:00:51 EDT 2022
Den 2022-04-11 kl. 20:29, skrev Dave Froble:
> On 4/11/2022 1:53 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
>> On 2022-04-11, gah4 <gah4 at u.washington.edu> wrote:
>>> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 10:00:07 AM UTC-7, Henry Crun wrote:
>>>
>>> (snip)
>>>
>>>> Or (strictly illegal, at your own risk and I will deny saying this)
>>>> google for pakgen.c
>>>
>>> I haven't read the DMCA so closely, or so recently, but I suspect that
>>> setting the
>>> date back is also illegal.
>>>
>>
>> The other problem is that, in addition to being illegal in its own right,
>> bypassing old hobbyist licences in this way may make VSI far less generous
>> when it comes to future hobbyist programs.
>>
>> Simon.
>>
>
> You're amusing ...
>
> Do you imagine there is even one person at VSI that doesn't understand the
> issues, and doesn't sympathize with people wanting to play with an old VAX?
In this case, it was not "an old VAX", it was an emulation.
And in this case, why not emulate an Alpha instead?
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list