[Info-vax] General Availability of 9.2 for x86-64

[John Dallman]

In article <29ea21d2-6a16-4dfd-b74e-f38a048616a4n at googlegroups.com>,
xyzzy1959 at gmail.com (John Reagan) wrote:

> Simon's post made me think.  Are you talking about some headers for
> native assembler coding?  Like the macros we provide for Macro-32
> coding?  No.  Nothing like that.
> 
> We did create a new SDL backend to create native assembler constants
> and such but nothing like routine prototypes, etc

That was what I was asking, because of the fondness of some posters for
low-ish level programming. Not doing it is perfectly reasonable AFAICS. 

John