[Info-vax] Calling $CREPRC in COBOL
Richard Maher
maher_rjSPAMLESS at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 20 20:46:05 EDT 2022
On 20/06/2022 11:23 am, Richard Maher wrote:
> On 20/06/2022 10:20 am, Dave Froble wrote:
>> On 6/10/2022 4:34 PM, Craig A. Berry wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/10/22 2:57 PM, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
>>>> On 6/10/22 15:03, Craig A. Berry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/10/22 1:27 PM, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/10/22 14:16, Craig A. Berry wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/10/22 12:39 PM, VAXman- at SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
>>>>>>>> 10 ENQ-TYPE PIC X(1) VALUE EXTERNAL PQL$_ENQLM.
>>>>>>>> ..............^ %COBOL-E-EXTREFVAL, VALUE EXTERNAL clause
>>>>>>>> ignored - valid only on COMP data-item
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How do you put PQL$ items in to a COBOL "byte"?
>>>
>>>> I have no idea what POL$_ENOLM means or what he is trying to do
>>>> with it. A rough guess would be rather than declaring it external
>>>> he needs to use some VMS Specific function to grab the value and
>>>> load it into ENO-TYPE.
>>>
>>> If SDL produces COBOL text libraries and there is a way to include
>>> them (some variant of COPY?) then yes, he might be able to do the
>>> equivalent of "#include <pqldef.h>" and not need the external
>>> declaration. But the external declaration is an ancient hack that
>>> at one time was more reliable than depending on the existence of
>>> programmer-friendly definitions, and also, if you were willing to
>>> link at installation time, could insulate against version-specific
>>> changes to the symbol value.
>>
>> What I'm having a problem with is expecting the linker to find the
>> declared external data. PQL_ENQLM is a SYSGEN parameter. Not
>> something the linker could find, unless linking against the system
>> image, and I have no idea if linking against the system image would
>> provide that parameter.
>>
>> I could be wrong, hell I'm usually wrong these days. I do not think
>> Brian gave enough information.
>>
>> From my occasional playing with CREPRC what I remember is that the
>> PQL parameters are used when a specific parameter is not provided.
>> Thus, just don't provide that parameter to CREPRC. I never did.
>>
>
> I think you'll find the process defaults rarely match your needs. For me
> I create a server process username and $persona_assume before the
> $creprc but also preload the quotas from a $getuai before hand.
>
> The linker resolved PQL$m_ENQLM symbol does NOT contain a value for lock
> limits it is merely telling creprc that the next item-list parameter
> contains this value.
More pearls go unnoticed
BTW If someone is better at the GOOGLE Groups interface than me you can
get the entire solution
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list