[Info-vax] Special deals on Tape Drives

Arne Vajhøj arne at vajhoej.dk
Mon Mar 7 14:14:17 EST 2022


On 3/6/2022 2:42 PM, kemain.nospam at gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Info-vax <info-vax-bounces at rbnsn.com> On Behalf Of Arne Vajhøj via Info-vax
>> On 3/6/2022 8:56 AM, kemain.nospam at gmail.com wrote:
>>> "Public Cloud" is just another name for outsourcing parts of your IT
>>> to other vendors like Microsoft (Azure), Amazon (AWS) in return for
>>> paying a fee for monthly services your company has contracted with.
>>>
>>> Like outsourcing, moving to a public cloud means you are leaving
>>> behind those portions of your current service model that you decide
>>> can be done better by someone other than your current provider e.g.
>>> your internal IT
>>
>> I believe that flexibility/scalability and the paying for usage model is what is
>> driving cloud not a desire to out-source.
>>
> 
> The capacity on demand model (COD) has been around for numerous decades and
> was/is available from many vendors.
> 
>> But cloud does imply some outsourcing.
>>
>> IaaS:
>> * maintenance of facility (power, cooling, network connectivity)
>> * installation and monitoring of hardware
>>
>> PaaS/FaaS:
>> * maintenance of facility (power, cooling, network connectivity)
>> * installation and monitoring of hardware
>> * OS installation/maintenance/monitoring
>> * platform software installation/maintenance/monitoring
>>
>> SaaS:
>> * maintenance of facility (power, cooling, network connectivity)
>> * installation and monitoring of hardware
>> * OS installation/maintenance/monitoring
>> * platform software installation/maintenance/monitoring
>> * application development
>> * application installation/maintenance/monitoring
> 
> All (ok, most) outsourcers have a tremendous flexibility .. the IaaS, PaaS
> models are simply new cloud buzz words for what outsourcers like HP, IBM,
> EDS (aka HPE) have traditionally provided with custom outsourcing contracts.
> That is before some of these big companies sold off their outsource
> divisions.

It is possible that some outsourcing people like to think about it that way.

But they are totally missing the point.

Cloud and outsourcing are orthogonal aspects.

Cloud is about using another companies hardware.

Outsourcing is about using another companies people.

They can be freely combined.

You can run your own servers with your own IT staff.

You can run AWS instances with your own staff.

You can run your own servers with IBM/TCS/whoever staff.

You can run AWS instances with IBM/TCS/whoever staff.

> Want just DC services? No problem - they will provide a custom quote for
> you.
> 
> Same for options where outsourcer provides DC/infrastructure / OS services,
> but Cust does App /DB/middleware layers.
> 
> All were previously custom outsourcing contracts.

IaaS is extremely little outsourcing.

PaaS/FaaS/SaaS implies more outsourcing but it is a consequence not the 
goal.

>>> When all of the real costs of "Public Cloud" outsourcing is
>>> considered, it becomes pretty clear why many M-L companies are
>>> deciding to go with the "Private Cloud" model whereby they have many
>>> of the same features as a Public Cloud e.g. provisioning on demand,
>>> capacity on demand, but with a much more integrated service model and
>>> with more integrated security that does not require them to manage and
>>> contract out to many and often different outsourcer vendors.
>>
>> Some go for private cloud.
>>
>> Some go for hybrid cloud.
>>
>> But the majority goes for public cloud.
> 
> Like outsourcing, its easy for managers to fall into the trap of "why not
> give this XYZ function to another vendor who specializes in managing this
> XYZ function". However, like Outsourcing, Public Cloud vendors and
> proponents will stress "IT lite" things like how much cpu's cost per hour.
> However, the biggest costs (by far) are those costs associated with
> redesigning, implementing and on-going support of a multi-vendor provided
> support model.
> 
> When the IT maturity of a M-L company rises to a certain level and gains
> experience with "Public Cloud", they begin to realize that they can
> internally provide the same on demand server VM provisioning developers
> like, with much better integrated security (SOC/NOC / service desk
> integration) than that of a Public Cloud.
> 
> Reference:
> Forbes.com: " Why Is Cloud Migration Reversing From Public To On-Premises
> Private Clouds?" - August 2021
> <https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterbendorsamuel/2021/08/10/why-is-cloud-migr
> ation-reversing-from-public-to-on-premises-private-clouds/?sh=4ff3578563cc>
> 
> Extracts -
> 
> "Increasingly this year, we see many companies that aggressively migrated
> their work from on-premises clouds looking to move work back to on-premises
> and private clouds. The mindset that the public cloud saves money because a
> company only pays for what it uses is just theoretical and really an
> illusion. Realistically, companies tend to buy capacity rather than actual
> time used. Thus, companies are in a take-or-pay situation like the economics
> of a private cloud or on-premises solution."
> 
> "However, there was a lot of speculation that at some point, the hyperscale
> cloud provider would start to take greater profits, and economies of scale
> would start to diminish. Both appear to be happening now. This is not
> surprising because we know that it is rational for companies to start to
> emphasize profitability."

It happens.

But in the end the number are pretty clear.

IaaS public cloud market is growing around 25% per year. And it is
expected to continue so for the next 5 years.

Arne





More information about the Info-vax mailing list