[Info-vax] SSL V3

[Mark Daniel]

On 17/2/22 4:06 am, Mark Daniel wrote:

8< snip 8<>>> I have been building OpenSSL 3.0.0 and 3.0.1 since release 
and
>>> currently have an unresolved performance issue open
>>>
>>> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/16552
>>>
>>> As VSI have released
>>>
>>> VSI X86VMS SSL111 V1.1-1MA    Full LP   Install    Val 04-FEB-2022
>>>
>>> only in the last couple of weeks, the announcement seems a little odd.
>>
>> I think the only news here for you is that other people who rely on an
>> installation kit can now find the problems you've already found by
>> building your own from source.
> 
> The released kit contains the described performance issue.
> 
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/16552
> 
> $ @build_sesola3.com 1
> $ mcr []sesola3
> OpenSSL 1.1.1k  25 Mar 2021
> value: 1
> ELAPSED: 0 00:00:00.20 CPU: 0:00:00.19 BUFIO: 4 DIRIO: 7 FAULTS: 158
> $ @build_sesola3.com 3
> $ mcr []sesola3
> OpenSSL 3.0.1 14 Dec 2021
> value: 1
> ELAPSED: 0 00:00:06.63 CPU: 0:00:06.58 BUFIO: 4 DIRIO: 7 FAULTS: 237
8< snip 8<

The recent OpenSSL 3.0.2 release does not address the issue, in fact 
it's gone backwards.  Freshly built and executed.

$ mcr []sesola3.EXE
OpenSSL 1.1.1k 25 Mar 2021
value: 1
ELAPSED: 0 00:00:00.19 CPU: 0:00:00.19 BUFIO: 4 DIRIO: 7 FAULTS: 159

$ mcr []sesola3.EXE
OpenSSL 3.0.1 14 Dec 2021
value: 1
ELAPSED: 0 00:00:06.50 CPU: 0:00:06.39 BUFIO: 4 DIRIO: 7 FAULTS: 142

$ mcr []sesola3.EXE
OpenSSL 3.0.2 15 Mar 2022
value: 1
ELAPSED: 0 00:00:08.33 CPU: 0:00:08.29 BUFIO: 4 DIRIO: 7 FAULTS: 155

-- 
Anyone, who using social-media, forms an opinion regarding anything 
other than the relative cuteness of this or that puppy-dog, needs 
seriously to examine their critical thinking.