[Info-vax] Viable versus ideal programming languages

[Dave Froble]

On 3/22/2022 2:38 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
> On 2022-03-21, Bill Gunshannon <bill.gunshannon at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/21/22 14:46, Simon Clubley wrote:
>>>
>>> I would say that C is a _viable_ programming language in that case,
>>> but I would not say that it is an _ideal_ programming language.
>>>
>>> You may end up using something that is viable but is not your preferred
>>> language. This could be due to language availability across multiple
>>> environments, the ability of the language to be easily called from
>>> other languages, etc.
>>>
>>> This is especially important when you are writing library code for
>>> example. Consider that I can write a portable library in C, and I can
>>> then compile it unchanged on VMS, Linux/FreeBSD/Unix, Windows, embedded
>>> operating systems, bare metal ARM/MIPS/etc, and even 8/16-bit MCUs if
>>> the library is small enough.
>>>
>>> I can then easily call that C library from a wide range of languages
>>> running on those multiple operating systems and environments. The language
>>> also allows me to create code that runs both in kernel mode and user mode.
>>>
>>> Name one other programming language that allows me to do all that.
>>
>> What does any of that have to do with the language?  The specific
>> compiler maybe, but not necessarily the language.  I could see
>> not doing it in COBOL and probably LISP but otherwise, most languages
>> can do what you want.
>>
>
> Fine. Where do I find the compilers in today's world that allow me
> to do all of the above in a language other than C ? :-)
>
> BTW, you are not going to be writing kernel mode device drivers or
> kernel modules in Fortran (for example).
>
> BTW #2, you can only easily call C++ code from a non-C++ program by
> providing a C interface in the C++ library so you are back to using
> C as an interface language even with C++...
>
> Would be nice if that was not the only viable option, but the problem
> is that C is a very viable language in all of these cases, even when
> it is not an ideal language, so no-one has developed a viable alternative
> over the decades.
>
> Simon.
>

Your argument is, that if one desires to have transportable code, then C allows 
that.

But what if one never intends to have transportable code?  Then the argument is 
meaningless, and, one should choose the language(s) that best support the 
task(s) intended.

-- 
David Froble                       Tel: 724-529-0450
Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc.      E-Mail: davef at tsoft-inc.com
DFE Ultralights, Inc.
170 Grimplin Road
Vanderbilt, PA  15486