[Info-vax] The real problem that needs solving to grow VMS

[kemain.nospam at gmail.com]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Info-vax <info-vax-bounces at rbnsn.com> On Behalf Of Simon Clubley
> via Info-vax
> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2022 9:41 AM
> To: info-vax at rbnsn.com
> Cc: Simon Clubley <clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP>
> Subject: Re: [Info-vax] The real problem that needs solving to grow VMS
> 
> On 2022-11-06, Dave Froble <davef at tsoft-inc.com> wrote:
> > On 11/2/2022 9:23 AM, Simon Clubley wrote:
> >> You correctly talk about only small numbers being required to try VMS
> >> compared to the industry as a whole.
> >>
> >> You have not yet talked about _why_ even those small numbers would
> be
> >> persuaded to try VMS. IOW, you have not yet answered the question I
> >> asked at the start of this thread.
> >
> > VMS is not new.  It's capabilities are well known and documented.  If
> > a person is competent, and VMS best fits the needs, then choose VMS.
> > If VMS is the best fit, and not chosen, that again goes back to
"competent",
> right?
> >
> 
> And now we are back to what is essentially my original question: In what
> situation would VMS be considered "the best fit" for a new installation
these
> days ?
> 
> Simon.
> 

How about an application environment whereby the nature of the application
environment required a well established shared disk strategy rather than a
shared nothing strategy?

Reference: Pro's and Con's of shared disk vs. shared nothing
<http://www.benstopford.com/2009/11/24/understanding-the-shared-nothing-arch
itecture/>


Regards,

Kerry Main
Kerry dot main at starkgaming dot com






-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com