In article <6f314de0-5d15-416c-8d08-10441966e681n at googlegroups.com>, xyzzy1959 at gmail.com (John Reagan) wrote: > Well, I'd like to say C++17 (clang certainly supports that) but we > still need to work on some of the STL packages. So syntax wise, > C++17, STL wise, stick to C++14. OK, so not a cutting-edge clang at first. John