[Info-vax] Clang
Dave Froble
davef at tsoft-inc.com
Tue Nov 15 21:42:46 EST 2022
On 11/15/2022 4:14 PM, Stephen Hoffman wrote:
> On 2022-11-15 14:09:16 +0000, Simon Clubley said:
>
>> On 2022-11-14, Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 2022-11-14 19:06:26 +0000, Simon Clubley said:
>>>
>>>> And now you need a C++17 compiler to be able to build LLVM itself...
>>>
>>> Do you have a particular environment where that's an issue?
>>>
>>
>> Given how critical LLVM has become, I would prefer a much more conservative
>> upgrade schedule on the required language standards for use with LLVM itself.
>
>
> How long would you suggest waiting before starting to adopt C++17 features?
>
>
> ~Five years, and ~most of two standards, maybe?
I'm curious. While I don't know diddly about C++, I'm wondering about all the
rather often upgrades to the standard. Was it that bad to begin with? Does it
really need such constant upgrades?
--
David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450
Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: davef at tsoft-inc.com
DFE Ultralights, Inc.
170 Grimplin Road
Vanderbilt, PA 15486
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list