[Info-vax] Micro Focus to be acquired by Open Text
Johnny Billquist
bqt at softjar.se
Sun Sep 4 07:04:17 EDT 2022
On 2022-09-03 19:24, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 9/3/2022 7:12 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>> On 2022-09-02 16:58, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> On 9/2/2022 10:48 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>>>> But I sortof half-fondly remember using RSTS/E in Sweden in the
>>>> early 80s. Accounts were PPNs, enclosed in brackets. Also used for
>>>> the directory. I had Ä120,114Å. :-)
>>>
>>> Did it allow <> instead of []?
>>
>> Nope. VMS and RSX have that, but RSTS/E didn't/don't.
>
> I wonder whether the <> support was due to ISO-646-national.
Indirectly maybe. But as far as I can remember, the direct reason why
VMS and RSX supports it was because at some point DEC made a decision to
start using it as directory/uic delimiters in all their OSes. But then
the decision was reversed. I don't know/remember the details now. But
the point is that TOPS-20 fully changed to using <> (not sure about
Tops-10), but VMS and RSX didn't. But they added the ability to use it,
since TOPS-20 systems did do the change, so you ended up in a situation
where both were accepted.
RSTS/E was sortof more on its own. Hardly even had proper DECnet back
then, and wasn't really in the midst of such discussions.
But the reason that the for a while decided that they should use <>
might have been because of ISO-646. I have no idea.
Johnny
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list