[Info-vax] VMS process communication

[Arne Vajhøj]

On 9/14/2022 5:13 AM, Marc Van Dyck wrote:
> Should layered/third party products like RTR, DEC MessageQ or even
> MQ Series (and its Opensource equivalents) be mentioned in such a work
> too ?

ActiveMQ is already there. If I were to add another message queue then
I would probably pick RabbitMQ as I think ActiveMQ/ArtemisMQ and
RabbitMQ are the two big ones today. But RabbitMQ code would be the
same as ActiveMQ code, because STOMP protocol and JMS API would
still be used. On the other side MQSeries/WebSphere MQ/IBM MQ
has a separate API besides the standard protocols/API so it
could be relevant. I just don't have access to the software.

I don't know much about RTR, but I got the impression that
it is way than a message queue - and I would probably
consider it out of scope.

Arne