[Info-vax] Python for x86?

[bill]

On 4/24/2023 12:18 PM, Andreas Eder wrote:
> On Fr 21 Apr 2023 at 17:00, kludge at panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
> 
>> =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=c3=b8j?=  <arne at vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>>> On 4/21/2023 10:51 AM, Chris Townley wrote:
>>>> On 21/04/2023 14:31, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>>> Getting abcl (lisp) working was really random luck.
>>>>>
>>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> Is Lisp still used these days?
>>>
>>> ABCL (Common Lisp on JVM and actually able to run on VMS)
>>> is actively maintained.
>>>
>>> And I believe there are several other Lisp implementations
>>> that are not EOL.
>>
>> I think most folks using lisp under VMS are using xlisp.  Which builds nicely
>> under VMS and a whole lot of other operating systems, and is pleasantly
>> common-lisp compatible if you like that sort of thing.
> 
> Compared to a real common lisp xlisp is just a toy.

Why? Did "real common lisp" go OOP like all the rest?

bill

(Up until my departure the University was still using Lisp in
the CS course and we used CLisp.)