[Info-vax] [cov] Spam adaptation test - please ignore

[Grant Taylor]

On 12/9/23 04:11, Subcommandante XDelta wrote:
> Conclusion: it's a kludge, but it does enable finding the wheat in the
> chaff.

"kludge" is probably an apt description.

> So RFC: If everyone commits to the discipline of using an agreed
> prefix, such as [cov] to the subject line, then signal is far less
> likely to fall through the cracks (abusing too many metaphors) when
> engaging in bulk spam management operations.

Relying on people to follow a process is prone to error.  It's a matter 
of when someone will forget / it will fail.  There is effectively no 
"if" involved.

No, I don't have a better solution, save for filtering all GG.  :-(



-- 
Grant. . . .