[Info-vax] VMS survivability

[Arne Vajhøj]

On 2/20/2023 6:09 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
> In article <tsug6g$hia4$4 at dont-email.me>,
> Arne Vajhøj  <arne at vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>> On 2/19/2023 4:35 PM, Dan Cross wrote:
>>> What's ironic is that the people making these decisions didn't
>>> quite understand the AT&T lawsuit, which was about _trade secret
>>> status_ of Unix, not copyright.  AT&T was trying to say that it
>>> was the system interface that was the real intellectual property
>>> that was being violated, not the specific expression of that
>>> interface.  This would have affected Linux, too, despite being
>>> an independent reimplementation.
>>
>> Do you use CharGPT to create this type of fiction?
> 
> Wow, rude.
> 
>> It was both copyright and trade secrets. Plus breach of contract
>> and trademark.
>>
>>  From the judges ruling:
>>
>> https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/832/790/1428569/
>>
>> [snip]
> 
> Tell me you weren't there without telling me that you weren't
> there.

I was not there.

But that does not change that the court document
proves that what you posted was pure fiction.

Arne