[Info-vax] VMS Cobol - GnuCOBOL

[bill]

On 3/2/2023 8:14 AM, plugh wrote:
> On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 6:08:00 AM UTC-7, plugh wrote:
>> On Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 6:21:54 AM UTC-7, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>>> On 2023-02-28 18:53, bill wrote:
>>>> On 2/28/2023 12:04 PM, Denys Beauchemin wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, February 27, 2023 at 7:11:36 PM UTC-6, Robert A. Brooks wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/27/2023 6:35 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But isn't that the case for all VMS compilers? I know
>>>>>>> I use /DEB/NOOP for both Fortran, Pascal and C when I want
>>>>>>> to debug.
>>>>>> Reagan may weigh in here, but I'm pretty sure that DEC suggested using
>>>>>> /DEBUG/NOOP when using the debugger for any language with an
>>>>>> optimizer back in
>>>>>> the 80's; if so, then that's been a pretty consistent message.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- Rob
>>>>> Speaking of debuggers.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not clear on how you can actually debug a gnucobol program, since
>>>>> it's C in reality.
>> <snip>
>>> Johnny
>>
>> Speaking of debugging GnuCobol (nee open-cobol)
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnucobol-users/2009-06/msg00003.html
>> I can't say why I never followed up. Anyway, it looks like the problem's been solved in the meanwhile.
> 
> Sorry, I think that was bill, not Johnny

None of the included content was from me.  Not sure if any of it was
from Johnny but I don't think so.

bill