[Info-vax] DIBOL-11

[Chris Townley]

On 10/03/2023 23:56, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 3/10/2023 6:26 PM, bill wrote:
>> Just something that popped into my head that I thought I would share.
>>
>> I wondered why DIBOL came into being at all given what was already
>> available from DEC.  And then it hit me.  It was obviously DEC's
>> answer to IBM's RPG.
>>
>> Does that sound right to anyone else?
> 
> I don't know Dibol - my understanding is that
> it is a sort of a hybrid between Cobol and Basic.
> I don't know RPG either.
> 
> But anyway.
> 
> They had Cobol, Basic and PL/I among what I would
> call clearly business oriented languages plus Pascal,
> Fortran and Ada  that also sometimes was used for
> such programming.
> 
> But I am not so surprised they wanted Dibol as well.
> There tend to always be a pretty broad palette of
> programming languages for such general purpose.
> Different domains, different developer preferences
> etc. tend to steer towards many programming languages.
> Having 4 or 7 languages does not seem
> excessive to me.
> 
> If someone wanted to start such an application today,
> then they would have even more choices. Java, Scala, Kotlin,
> Groovy, C#, VB.NET, PHP and Python are definitely used for such
> plus C, C++ and Go are also used for such.
> 
> Arne
> 

I am sure you could add a few more...

-- 
Chris