[Info-vax] COBOL example $MGBLSC
Arne Vajhøj
arne at vajhoej.dk
Sat Sep 9 10:26:24 EDT 2023
On 9/9/2023 10:20 AM, Jan-Erik Söderholm wrote:
> Den 2023-09-09 kl. 16:02, skrev Dave Froble:
>> On 9/9/2023 9:29 AM, Jan-Erik Söderholm wrote:
>>> "Throughout this manual, and except where specific rules apply, the
>>> hyphen (-) and the underline (_) are treated as the same character
>>> in a user-defined word."
>>
>> I guess that could be compared to "case insensitive", but while I
>> consider case sensitivity to be less than reasonable, I find the above
>> to be really stupid. Sure makes searching for specific words in a
>> program complex.
>>
>> Got to understand Bill's objection to such.
>
> Stupid or not, it was not known to Bill and created that
> wrong comment of being two differnt symbols. I just showed
> that they are probably handled as the same symbol.
>
> That doesn't mean that I disagree with you... :-)
Old languages sometimes has some rules that appears
very weird, because the expectation today is determined
by how a hundred newer languages has agreed on doing things
a different way.
Take as an example this perfectly valid Fortran 77 program:
program weird
integer*4 abc
abc = 123
write(*,*) abc
write(*,*) a b c
write(*,*) a b c
end
WTF??
Arne
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list