[Info-vax] openvms and xterm

[Dan Cross]

In article <uvtuef$tku$1 at tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>,
Grant Taylor  <gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
>On 4/19/24 05:10, motk wrote:
>> ... what?
>
>Just because something is not new doesn't mean that it's bad.
>
>OpenVMS is not new by any stretch of the imagination.
>
>It's an old technology that's still actively being maintained.
>
>Old and actively maintained is okay.
>
>Old and unmaintained is going to become a problem, it's only a question 
>of when.

I think that motk's point was that X11 is essentially
unmaintained.  There's some limited life support going
on, but no real active development, or even bug fixes.

	- Dan C.