[Info-vax] openvms and xterm

[chrisq]

On 4/30/24 06:17, motk wrote:
> On 28/04/2024 10:05 am, chrisq wrote:
> 
>> I read the article linked to elsewhere. Something like >60 separate 
>> binaries for all the functionality. It's entrails into every aspect of
>> the system, far more than that needed for init.
> 
> Are you okay? Why are you ignoring the clear explanations given, and 
> just sitting on your bum grumping like Eyore?
> 
> This is just sad.

Yes, sad that you just ad hom, rather than address the points I was 
making, in all your replies.

Dozens of new binaries sounds like a wide attack surface for potential
mischief, but perhaps you disagree ?. The more complex any system
becomes, the more likely it is to have vulnerabilities and points of
failure...

>