[Info-vax] EISNER is moving again this week

[Dan Cross]

In article <uriuf2$iv6$1 at reader1.panix.com>,
Dan Cross <cross at spitfire.i.gajendra.net> wrote:
>In article <uril3c$2m8au$1 at dont-email.me>,
>Hunter Goatley  <goathunter at goatley.com> wrote:
>>EISNER will be moving again soon---as in this week, if all goes well.
>>
>>In fact, the system is being replaced. VSI has hosted the physical 
>>system for the past few years, but Process Software will be taking over 
>>hosting, and the machine is being replaced by a vtAlpha system, thanks 
>>to AVT and Vere Technologies, who generously donated a license for the 
>>system.
>>
>>With Rob's help, we transferred the contents of all of the disks 
>>yesterday, and I now have virtual EISNER up and running in-house. We 
>>still have some networking work to do before we can switch the systems, 
>>and I'll need to re-transfer the user disks next week to pick up files 
>>created or modified since yesterday.
>>
>>Whichever day this happens, I plan to shut down access to EISNER while 
>>we move the data and change the DNS entries. Hopefully, access to the 
>>system will only be down for a few hours, whichever day that is.
>>
>>More info later this week!
>
>Purely out of curiosity, why not host it on x86?
>
>	- Dan C.
>Purely out of curiosity, why not host it on x86?
>
>	- Dan C.
>Purely out of curiosity, why not host it on x86?
>
>	- Dan C.
>Purely out of curiosity, why not host it on x86?
>
>	- Dan C.
>Purely out of curiosity, why not host it on x86?
>
>	- Dan C.
>Purely out of curiosity, why not host it on x86?
>
>	- Dan C.
>Purely out of curiosity, why not host it on x86?
>
>	- Dan C.
>Purely out of curiosity, why not host it on x86?
>
>	- Dan C.
>

(Oops.  Dunno what happened here....  I assume I hit the
wrong button.  :-/)

	- Dan C.