[Info-vax] VMS Basic strings class D vs class S
Arne Vajhøj
arne at vajhoej.dk
Wed Feb 28 09:38:03 EST 2024
On 2/26/2024 4:17 PM, Stephen Hoffman wrote:
> On 2024-02-25 21:33:33 +0000, Arne Vajhøj said:
>
>> If I have understood it correctly then VMS Basic strings use class D
>> descriptors.
>>
>> That is very nice.
>>
>> But what happens if non-Basic code call Basic code with a string using
>> a class S descriptor? For input/read? For output/write?
>>
>> Does the Basic runtime call some STR$ function that understands the
>> difference between S and D and handle A properly? Or will I get a
>> runtime error due to invalid string?
>
> "It depends."
>
> Most everything in most of the traditional languages and in the RTLs
> does the right thing with both dynamic and static text strings, though
> the app code involved might not. BASIC app code works pretty well here,
> absent "heroic" efforts by the app developer.
>
> If the app code assumes a dynamic arriving and gets handed static, the
> RTL will either copy it, or space-pad the results into the static, or
> the RTL will return a string truncation error. BASIC space-pads into
> static string buffers if and as needed. Or truncates with an error.
> Apps expecting to work with dynamic descriptors might fail with the
> truncation error as mentioned, and apps expecting to massage static
> descriptors directly and not coded sufficiently cautiously around any
> arriving dynamic strings can fail with heap and other errors.
Basic cannot stuff 200 bytes into a 100 bytes fixed length string. That
is fair.
> it wouldn't surprise me to learn that BASIC will fail to work correctly
> with 64-bit string descriptors, though. Lots of home-grown app code also
> won't.
I sort of get the impression that using 64 bit descriptors is like
doing a bungee jump.
:-)
> I also wouldn't expect the RTLs to work with encodings other than
> ASCII and DEC MCS, either. And UTF-8 will fail in the expected places,
> and most searching and sorting tends not to be sensitive to the
> (written) language used within the text string.
I would assume that it works as long as the string is considered
a sequence of bytes not a sequence of characters.
Arne
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list