[Info-vax] RMS intro

[Craig A. Berry]

On 1/2/24 7:24 AM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 1/2/2024 7:46 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
>> Single Stage to Orbit wrote:
>>> Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>> You sort of get both with WSL.
>>>
>>> No, WSL is terrible! Use WSL2 instead.
>>
>> Performance-wise sure, but there is a certain technical elegance to 
>> the WSL1 mechanism.
> 
> Was the problem with WSL1 performance?
> 
> I always thought that the problem was compatibility
> (that 99.9% compatibility was not god enough).

The docs say that WSL2 performance is worse than WSL1 for operations
involving file system integration.  Details here:

https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/4197#issuecomment-604592340