[Info-vax] Apache + mod_php performance
Mark Daniel
mark.daniel at wasd.vsm.com.au
Tue Oct 8 13:22:26 EDT 2024
On 9/10/2024 02:13, Mark Berryman wrote:
> On 10/7/24 1:05 PM, Mark Daniel wrote:
>> On 8/10/2024 03:17, Mark Berryman wrote:
>>> On 10/6/24 9:12 AM, Michael S wrote:
>> 8< snip 8<
>>>> As a lurker, I am waiting for the expert answer with interest.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It is most definitely possible as that is precisely what the
>>> auxiliary server in TCPIP Services does. It listens for a
>>> connection, then creates a process to handle it. See the description
>>> of TCPIP$C_AUXS in the TCPIP Services programming documentation.
>> 8< snip 8<
>>
>> The auxiliary is something special. Passing socket devices between
>> processes requires SHARE privilege.
>>
> > [ program example deleted ]
>
> This is one way to do it since the SHARE privilege will allow you to
> open a device that is already open by another process. However, since I
> can find no evidence that processes started by the auxiliary server
> require the SHARE privilege, that would indicate to me that the server
> uses a different method.
Absolutely they do not but with these
ACNT ALLSPOOL ALTPRI AUDIT BUGCHK BYPASS
CMEXEC CMKRNL DIAGNOSE DOWNGRADE EXQUOTA GROUP
GRPNAM GRPPRV IMPERSONATE IMPORT LOG_IO MOUNT
NETMBX OPER PFNMAP PHY_IO PRMCEB PRMGBL
PRMMBX PSWAPM READALL SECURITY SETPRV SHARE
SHMEM SYSGBL SYSLCK SYSNAM SYSPRV TMPMBX
UPGRADE VOLPRO WORLD
plus all the facility available to TCPIP$BGDRIVER.EXE why would they?
The example showed a mechanism available to pass established sockets
between unrelated processes provided IPC is available; can be simple as
logical name+value, or doorbell lock name+value, etc.
> Mark Berryman
--
Anyone, who using social-media, forms an opinion regarding anything
other than the relative cuteness of this or that puppy-dog, needs
seriously to examine their critical thinking.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list