[Info-vax] Apache + mod_php performance
Mark Daniel
mark.daniel at wasd.vsm.com.au
Tue Oct 8 17:24:41 EDT 2024
On 9/10/2024 06:01, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 10/8/2024 1:22 PM, Mark Daniel wrote:
>> On 9/10/2024 02:13, Mark Berryman wrote:
>>> On 10/7/24 1:05 PM, Mark Daniel wrote:
>>>> On 8/10/2024 03:17, Mark Berryman wrote:
>>>>> It is most definitely possible as that is precisely what the
>>>>> auxiliary server in TCPIP Services does. It listens for a
>>>>> connection, then creates a process to handle it. See the
>>>>> description of TCPIP$C_AUXS in the TCPIP Services programming
>>>>> documentation.
>>>> 8< snip 8<
>>>>
>>>> The auxiliary is something special. Passing socket devices between
>>>> processes requires SHARE privilege.
>>>>
>>> > [ program example deleted ]
>>>
>>> This is one way to do it since the SHARE privilege will allow you to
>>> open a device that is already open by another process. However,
>>> since I can find no evidence that processes started by the auxiliary
>>> server require the SHARE privilege, that would indicate to me that
>>> the server uses a different method.
>>
>> Absolutely they do not but with these
>>
>> ACNT ALLSPOOL ALTPRI AUDIT BUGCHK BYPASS
>> CMEXEC CMKRNL DIAGNOSE DOWNGRADE EXQUOTA GROUP
>> GRPNAM GRPPRV IMPERSONATE IMPORT LOG_IO MOUNT
>> NETMBX OPER PFNMAP PHY_IO PRMCEB PRMGBL
>> PRMMBX PSWAPM READALL SECURITY SETPRV SHARE
>> SHMEM SYSGBL SYSLCK SYSNAM SYSPRV TMPMBX
>> UPGRADE VOLPRO WORLD
>>
>> plus all the facility available to TCPIP$BGDRIVER.EXE why would they?
>
> You think the auxiliary server set a few fields (like UIC and PID) for
> the BG device?
More likely the driver itself but with an integrated suite of
functionality the distinction is somewhat moot.
> Arne
--
Anyone, who using social-media, forms an opinion regarding anything
other than the relative cuteness of this or that puppy-dog, needs
seriously to examine their critical thinking.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list