[Info-vax] SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?
Richard Jordan
usenet at cropcircledogs.com
Thu Sep 5 13:30:53 EDT 2024
On 8/6/24 2:49 PM, Richard Jordan wrote:
> I have contacted VSI but thought I'd ask here too. If anyone can give
> this a try and let me know if they experience the problem I'd appreciate
> knowing.
>
> Integrity server, VMS V8.4-2L1, TCPIP V5.7 eco 5 with any later hotfixes
> as of June 2023 applied.
>
> V8.4-2L3 is coming but I can't install it to check for a while.
>
> We use the 'sendmail.com' freeware to send email with binary attachments
> (mostly PDFs) with customized SMTP headers. On this VSI system we get a
> single error every time we run SFF from the command procedure.
>
> Exact same procedure on a V8.3 Alpha and an HP V8.4 Integrity run
> without error so we're tentatively calling it a VSI issue.
>
> Every run using symbol form via
>
> sff :== $SYS$SYSTEM:TCPIP$SMTP_SFF.EXE
>
> (as defined within sendmail.com)
>
> generates the following error, but also still creates the email
> successfully:
>
> %LIB-F-INVNBDS, invalid numeric byte data string
>
> Happens with any normal or priv'd account, regardless of the body text
> file, presence or absence of attachments, who the recipient is, presence
> or absence of a subject line.
>
> I don't have any other systems to test on (specifically no other VSI
> systems).
>
> Thanks for any info.
Problem identified. There was an incorrect parameter in the
TCPIP$SMTP.CONF file. At some point in the past year someone had turned
on SMTP debugging, including adding a SYMBIONT-DEBUG. When they
finished, instead of deleting or commenting that line out they set the
parameter to FALSE. But its supposed to be a bit map with a value of
0 through 8.
That generated the error but without useful context. We found it when
booting their disaster recovery server with 6 month old system disk copy
didn't produce the error until we specifically updated that .conf file
to current.
VSI may take a look at the issue (of error message context) in their 6.0
stack.
Thanks to all who replied.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list