[Info-vax] AVAIL_MAN Itanic Hobbyist License?

[IanMiller]

On Oct 9, 9:22 am, pe... at langstoeger.at (Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOeGER)
wrote:
> In article <op.u1hovg1bdc3... at notemv-tap.mv.privat>, "Martin Vorlaender" <m... at pdv-systeme.de> writes:
> >IanMiller wrote:
> >> AVAIL_MAN is in the PAK for the Itainium if its Mission critical OE -
> >> perhaps its the same for the hobbyist licence?
>
> >You need at least EOE for the Collector, and FOE for the Analyzer, see
> >http://h71000.www7.hp.com/openvms/products/availman/prod_sup.html
>
> Yup. This was/is different to (VAX and) Alpha, where the OPENVMS PAK
> is used by AVAIL_MAN_ANA_SRVR and AVAIL_MAN_COL, but was/is documented.
>
> http://openvms.compaq.com/openvms/integrity/openvms_operating_environ...
>
> You need an AVAIL_MAN or MCOE or EOE PAK for the AM Collector on Itanic.
>
> >The hobbyist VMS I64 license is a FOE one (at least my current PAK is,
> >dated 2-JAN-2009).
>
> Yup. As it is for years now (but hobbyist with MCOE would be neat ;-)
>
> But, what has changed, announced recently with cited openvms.org article?
>
> Did a AVAIL_MAN PAK get added to the Hobbyist Layered PAKs for the I64?
> (Is that one/the reason for the difference in Lay PAKs for Itanic and for
> the rest? I wonder, because I had so far no problems with the "common"
> Lay PAKs on my Itanic - I need to check for the exact differences)
>
> My I64 Lay PAKs now have all the IA64 attribute, but no MCOE, no EOE
> and unfortunately no AVAIL_MAN.
>
> So, I still don't see/know, what the article wanted to tell me/us...
>
> Anyone?
>
> --
> Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTÖGER
> Network and OpenVMS system specialist
> E-mail  Pe... at LANGSTOeGER.at
> A-1030 VIENNA  AUSTRIA              I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist


I am inquiring about this