[Info-vax] Simh Licensing question 3900 vs 780
Bob Koehler
koehler at eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org
Tue Oct 27 10:53:00 EDT 2009
In article <00dbd89d$0$23376$c3e8da3 at news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot at vaxination.ca> writes:
>
>
> If I use SIMH in a "780" mode instead of 3900, do I lose any
> speed/functionality ? Am concerned about executables compiled for modern
> vaxes. Would they still run without problem on an emulated 780 ?
If it runs on a VAX, it runs on a VAX, at least for user mode
executables linked on the same or earlier versions of VMS. The
emulated 11/780 may or may not have support for G and H floating
point operations, a real 11/780 made that optional and didn't include
it in the FPA, so most folks didn't buy it. You'ld have to check the
SIMH documents. If I was putting 11/780 into SIMH, I'd certainly
include G and H code that's already there.
Only a few VAXen include support for the vector instructions. I
don't think SIMH supports those models, so there's a very good
chance the vector instructions aren't in there.
VMS itself includes the ability to emulate G, H, vector, and other
instructions not included in all hardware. So if you're patient
there's nothing you can't run.
When support was dropped for the 11/780, it meant that VMS
Engineering no longer tested on the 11/780, they didn't take time to
rip out the code. I'd not be suprized if 7.3 boots on a simulated
11/780 and runs just fine. I wouldn't be suprized if you could
boot it on a real 11/780, if you can fit the VMB.EXE on the 8 1/2 inch
floppy.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list