[Info-vax] The continued ham-stringing of IPsec/VMS - Cui Bono? - TUDs -

[Bob Koehler]

In article <-MSdndZ3TOeom3rXnZ2dnUVZ_r-dnZ2d at giganews.com>, "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88 at comcast.net> writes:
> 
> Which "great many" hardware platforms are we talking about?  I count 
> three: VAX, Alpha, and Itanic.  And I'd be willing to dispense with 
> Itanic!  If you have to test with every processor speed, every memory 
> size, every combination of I/O devices. . . .

   When it comes to testing VMS, a qbus is not an XBI, nor a PCI.  
   Although there should be no hardware dependencies in the feature
   in question, I suspect it's not being tested separately.