[Info-vax] Looking into C-include files on VMS
Steven Schweda
sms.antinode at gmail.com
Tue Oct 27 19:44:12 EDT 2009
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> I am currently trying to make compiling cdrtools a bit more automated.
More automated how? More than what's available here?:
http://antinode.info/dec/sw/cdrtools.html
> There are several problems:
How many haven't been solved already?
> - The filesystem only supports one dot "." in filenames which would
> require modifications in "configure"
Trying to force-fit a UNIX-like "configure" script onto a
VMS system seems to me to be the wrong way to do this job.
Which is why I did it differently. UnZip and VMSTAR both
adjust file names as needed for an ODS2 file system. My VMS
builders seem to cope, so far as I know.
> - OpenVMS 7.0 should support a POSIX compliant struct stat.st_ino
> but I cannot make this work.
What doesn't work? What did you try? Look for
__USING_STD_STAT in my code changes.
> **********************
> - I cannot see the ful content of the system include files.
> Could someone help me with hints on how to do this?
They can be extracted from the text library, if that hasn't
been done already. I think that it's not done automatically
now, though it once was. I should have a procedure somewhere
to do it.
> I am currntly trying to compile "smake" and use a static hand made
> configuration that was created by Mr. Heuser but I need to find a way to
> run commands via bash. What is the best way to do this? THere seems to be no
> fork() but vfork(). Will vfork()/exec() work?
Don't those static, hand-made configuration files handle
this?
I haven't published a kit since a59, and I still need (and
intend) to get the "find" code to work on VMS, but otherwise,
I'm not aware of significant problems with what I've done.
But I'm always open to a good complaint.
Does this wheel really need re-invention?
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list