[Info-vax] Comment on the future of OpenVMS

[FredK]

<VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG> wrote in message 
news:00A93AB6.87B44271 at SendSpamHere.ORG...
> In article <qRJFm.12420$U5.180027 at newsb.telia.net>, 
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan-Erik_S=F6derholm?= <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> 
> writes:
>>JF Mezei wrote:
>>> Jan-Erik Söderholm wrote:
>>>
>>>> No, it has been *moved* to the HP development center in India.
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, it has been moved to a different company that happens to be a
>>> wholly owned subsidiary of HP.
>>
>>So what ? Still not "outsourced" per definition.
>
> Does this thread serve any purpose?  Outsourced, off-shored, reloacated,
> reallocated, who gives a shit.  Our good long-time VMS friends in Nahsua
> are no more.
>

Not all.  And not all were actually in Nashua (or Marlboro).

> The FUD exuded here on a daily basis only adds to the depressed mood for
> the future of VMS.  How about nixing this thread and get back to discus-
> sing VMS itself.  Sheesh.  The ssh thread these past few days was one of
> the most refreshing thread postings I've read here in recent time.
>

A much better use of bandwidth, I agree.