[Info-vax] openvms and xterm

[Lawrence D'Oliveiro]

On Fri, 10 May 2024 01:50:42 +0100, chrisq wrote:

> On 5/9/24 22:56, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 7 May 2024 13:45:25 +0100, chrisq wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes, ZFS here since the very early versions of Solaris 10. Absolutely
>>> rock solid and has never lost any data here, nor had a situation that
>>> was not recoverable. Why use anything else ?.
>> 
>> And yet, Oracle won’t offer it, preferring to give their customers
>> btrfs instead.
> 
> Still very much in Solaris, but suspect conflicting licensing issues,
> Linux and ZFS, being the main reason it's not offered.

Yes, but Oracle *owns* the licence to ZFS. So they can offer it on 
whatever terms they like.