[Info-vax] Anyone interested in another public access system

[Jan-Erik Söderholm]

H Vlems wrote:
> On 20 mrt, 00:26, "Richard Maher" <maher... at hotspamnotmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>> Not wanting to bring undue attention to what you are doing, but how did you
>> get the OK for Rdb/SQL? Have they come out with a Hobbyist license?
>>
>> I use the "for purposes of developing a single prototype" clause for mine
>> but last I looked that didn't exetend as far as a public access box. (And I
>> tried hard to get just such a thing for the Deathrow cluster!)
>>
>> Cheers Richard Maher
>>
>> <totheedgeoft... at msn.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:9b054f2d-8eb4-4f6f-b2c4-6a6adf9af4c8 at j38g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hello
>>> With so many free VMS systems popping up, I was wondering if anybody
>>> would be interested
>>> in another one. Its a cluster of a 4000-100A,3100-90,3100-80,4000-500.
>>> This system has
>>> OfficeServer 6.1, WP51, and WPS plus FMS, Forms both RT and Dev,
>>> DECfax, and Document.
>>> Plus the standard compilers and SQL/RDB. Let me know.
>>> tks
>>> ed- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
> 
> There still is a (hard to find) hobbyist version of Oracle Rdb. I run
> version 7.1.mumble on Alpha/VMS 8.3
> Hans

What *is* a "hobbyist version" of Rdb ?
Is it any different than the "normal" Rdb ?

Jan-Erik