[Info-vax] Anyone interested in another public access system

[Richard Maher]

"Jan-Erik Söderholm" <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> wrote in message
news:V7Uwl.7258$U5.78310 at newsb.telia.net...
> H Vlems wrote:
> > On 20 mrt, 00:26, "Richard Maher" <maher... at hotspamnotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Ed,
> >>
> >> Not wanting to bring undue attention to what you are doing, but how did
you
> >> get the OK for Rdb/SQL? Have they come out with a Hobbyist license?
> >>
> >> I use the "for purposes of developing a single prototype" clause for
mine
> >> but last I looked that didn't exetend as far as a public access box.
(And I
> >> tried hard to get just such a thing for the Deathrow cluster!)
> >>
> >> Cheers Richard Maher
> >>
> >> <totheedgeoft... at msn.com> wrote in message
> >>
> >>
news:9b054f2d-8eb4-4f6f-b2c4-6a6adf9af4c8 at j38g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hello
> >>> With so many free VMS systems popping up, I was wondering if anybody
> >>> would be interested
> >>> in another one. Its a cluster of a 4000-100A,3100-90,3100-80,4000-500.
> >>> This system has
> >>> OfficeServer 6.1, WP51, and WPS plus FMS, Forms both RT and Dev,
> >>> DECfax, and Document.
> >>> Plus the standard compilers and SQL/RDB. Let me know.
> >>> tks
> >>> ed- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
> >> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
> >
> > There still is a (hard to find) hobbyist version of Oracle Rdb. I run
> > version 7.1.mumble on Alpha/VMS 8.3
> > Hans

Great! Anyone got a pointer to the license (historical or otherwise)?

>
> What *is* a "hobbyist version" of Rdb ?
> Is it any different than the "normal" Rdb ?

Same code/kit, different license Ts & Cs.
>
> Jan-Erik

Cheers Richard Maher