[Info-vax] Not all HP jobs have gone to India!

[VAXman- at SendSpamHere.ORG]

In article <4cded224$0$17209$c3e8da3$eb767761 at news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot at vaxination.ca> writes:
>VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
>>
>>>Thank you for this very nice accolade. If you call a criticism of a
>>>pro-duopoly policy in both USA and Canadian governments "pure hatred",
>> 
>> The duopoly being?  
>
>telephone company and cable company.

So there should be a trioply or a quadoply?  And those technologies would
be???  There are satellite providers and ye old over-the-airwaves terres-
trial broadcasts at least for your beloved TV programming.



>And consider that telephone companies now also depend on TV
>distribution.  So they are all the same now, and won't want the internet
>to cannabalise their TV distribution revenues. Shutting out competitors
>will allow this duopoly to cripple internet services to allow people to
>access faceboot and youtube, but make it very expensive to get netflix
>and google TV.

There's nothing worthwhile viewing anyway.  Just think how much brighter
(smarter) the world would be without "reality" TV.  Why, I could safely
walk the Seaside Heights boardwalk again without fear of being accosted
by NYC thugs bussed in droves to incite trouble poised as "Jersey Shore"
natives.  I do miss grabbing a Guinness at Jimbo's and then enjoying the
cool evening ocean breeze but SH has been made a shittier hole since the
advent of "Jersey Shore".  Just how many more avenues do you think we'll
need for "reality" TV?

However, I do support net-neutrality.  



>And when a cable/telco also owns TV network(s), they can also prevent
>access to outfits such as Google TV.

With that high quality Flash they're now showing?  

-- 
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker    VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG

All your spirit rack abuses, come to haunt you back by day.
All your Byzantine excuses, given time, given you away.