[Info-vax] HP stopping VMS paper documentation ?

[AEF]

On Dec 16, 4:19 pm, "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilber... at comcast.net>
wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 9:23 AM, Bob Koehler wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article<d99b6905-8568-44d6-8930-73a3a86d7... at m7g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>, AEF<spamsink2... at yahoo.com>  writes:
>
> >> Merriam Webster.
>
> >> Why not?
>
> >> What would you recommend?
>
> >     Check again.  Webster came up with a style of dictionary, and just
> >     about all publishers use it.
>
> >     On the cover page of the dictionary you can find out who actually
> >     published it.  They may not actually be Merriam Webster.  And they
> >     are responsible for the content.
>
> >     Sometimes the publisher will include a discussion of what
> >     self-proclaimed experts wrote the content.  Sometimes they just hack
> >     something togther that they can sell, and the content is amaizingly
> >     poor.
>
> >     And even M-W is wrong sometimes.
>
> Some dictionaries include deliberate errors for the purpose of proving
> Copyright infringement!

Say what? Can you give some examples?

AEF