[Info-vax] HP stopping VMS paper documentation ?

[Richard B. Gilbert]

On 12/16/2011 11:02 PM, AEF wrote:
> On Dec 16, 4:19 pm, "Richard B. Gilbert"<rgilber... at comcast.net>
> wrote:
>> On 12/16/2011 9:23 AM, Bob Koehler wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> In article<d99b6905-8568-44d6-8930-73a3a86d7... at m7g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>, AEF<spamsink2... at yahoo.com>    writes:
>>
>>>> Merriam Webster.
>>
>>>> Why not?
>>
>>>> What would you recommend?
>>
>>>      Check again.  Webster came up with a style of dictionary, and just
>>>      about all publishers use it.
>>
>>>      On the cover page of the dictionary you can find out who actually
>>>      published it.  They may not actually be Merriam Webster.  And they
>>>      are responsible for the content.
>>
>>>      Sometimes the publisher will include a discussion of what
>>>      self-proclaimed experts wrote the content.  Sometimes they just hack
>>>      something togther that they can sell, and the content is amaizingly
>>>      poor.
>>
>>>      And even M-W is wrong sometimes.
>>
>> Some dictionaries include deliberate errors for the purpose of proving
>> Copyright infringement!
>
> Say what? Can you give some examples?
>
> AEF

Not without more research than I'm willing to do.  I read it somewhere 
but I don't recall exactly where!