[Info-vax] ITRC is FCKD

[IanMiller]

On Feb 10, 3:00 pm, BillPedersen <peder... at ccsscorp.com> wrote:
> On Feb 10, 9:35 am, VAXman-  @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
>
>
>
> > In article <42667dae-c859-4a40-8f15-3da84bc4c... at s41g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>, abrsvc <dansabrservi... at yahoo.com> writes:
>
> > >On Feb 10, 9:08=A0am, VAXman-  @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
> > >> I went to log into ITRC today and when I click on the [continue>>] button
> > >> on the http: //forums11.itrc.hp.com / service / ciss / loginSelect.do pag=
> > >e
> > >> which shows my various IDs (and I have selected the ID that is tied to my
> > >> SAID) I get:
>
> > >> https: //forums11.itrc.hp.com / service / home / home.do
>
> > >> Could Not Open URL
> > >> The URL you requested does not exist or is not retrievable at this site.
> > >> You can return to the HP IT Resource Center home page (itrc.hp.com).
>
> > >> (Error HTTP_404)
>
> > >> --
> > >> VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker =A0 =A0VAXman(at)TMESIS(=
> > >dot)ORG
>
> > >> All your spirit rack abuses, come to haunt you back by day.
> > >> All your Byzantine excuses, given time, given you away.
>
> > >I had that earlier as well.  It clearer itself up a few minutes
> > >later.  Try again and you should be able to connect.
>
> > >Dan
>
> > I just tried to post and got:
>
> > 500: Server Error [%s]
>
> > --
> > VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker    VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
>
> > All your spirit rack abuses, come to haunt you back by day.
> > All your Byzantine excuses, given time, given you away.
>
> A link I saved does not work...
>
> A link offwww.hp.com/go/openvmsto the "ITRC forums" does appear to
> work.
>
> The primary difference is that my "saved" link is to "forums11" and
> the actual link from the OpenVMS page is to "forums1" - but you end up
> on "forums13"...
>
> Seems as if "forums11" is down.  I had reported issues with formatting
> and such on that portion of ITRC the other day and now, running  under
> "forums13" it formats correctly.  So much of the web support at HP is
> now done by "contract" groups and not the people responsible for the
> product that it seems they get caught up with things and do not keep
> them accurate or effective.


seems to be working now