[Info-vax] Uptime for OpenVMS
Bill Gunshannon
billg999 at cs.uofs.edu
Wed May 11 15:12:25 EDT 2011
In article <iqema8$ltc$1 at dont-email.me>,
glen herrmannsfeldt <gah at ugcs.caltech.edu> writes:
> Bill Gunshannon <billg999 at cs.uofs.edu> wrote:
>
> (snip, I wrote)
>>> For most, the disk has to keep running throughout. For a diskless
>>> client off an NFS server, even that isn't needed. (Diskless NFS
>>> clients survive a server reboot.)
>
>> Well, if you were considering possible disk failure, how about I build
>> a system with just a ramdisk? :-) No moving parts beyond electrons.
>
>> And talk about being old. Unless they have fixed it (which I
>> doubt as I never saw anyone in the linux crowd admit it was done
>> wrong) Linux versions of NFS are, in some way, stateful and a reboot
>> of the server requires a reboot of all the clients. One of the
>> reasons I have resisted moving anything here to Linux as we rely
>> very heavily on NFS and I can't be rebooting all our clients if I
>> have to take the fileserver down for any reason.
>
> Yes, all my diskless NFS work was with Sun hosts. I had many
> survive a server reboot. Then once we sold a server, while the
> clients sat there waiting for it to come back...
>
> Stateless (except for file lock) is supposed to be part of NFS.
True. And yet, people still wonder why I think Linux is pure crap.
bill
--
Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three wolves
billg999 at cs.scranton.edu | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton |
Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list