[Info-vax] Uptime for OpenVMS

[Johnny Billquist]

On 2011-05-11 13.12, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
> In article<iqema8$ltc$1 at dont-email.me>,
> 	glen herrmannsfeldt<gah at ugcs.caltech.edu>  writes:
>> Bill Gunshannon<billg999 at cs.uofs.edu>  wrote:
>>
>> (snip, I wrote)
>>>> For most, the disk has to keep running throughout.  For a diskless
>>>> client off an NFS server, even that isn't needed.  (Diskless NFS
>>>> clients survive a server reboot.)
>>
>>> Well, if you were considering possible disk failure, how about I build
>>> a system with just a ramdisk?  :-)  No moving parts beyond electrons.
>>
>>> And talk about being old. Unless they have fixed it (which I
>>> doubt as I never saw anyone in the linux crowd admit it was done
>>> wrong) Linux versions of NFS are, in some way, stateful and a reboot
>>> of the server requires a reboot of all the clients.  One of the
>>> reasons I have resisted moving anything here to Linux as we rely
>>> very heavily on NFS and I can't be rebooting all our clients if I
>>> have to take the fileserver down for any reason.
>>
>> Yes, all my diskless NFS work was with Sun hosts.  I had many
>> survive a server reboot.  Then once we sold a server, while the
>> clients sat there waiting for it to come back...
>>
>> Stateless (except for file lock) is supposed to be part of NFS.
>
> True.  And yet, people still wonder why I think Linux is pure crap.

Linux is crap. That's old news. :-)
But it's moving crap, which in some ways is better than things sitting 
still sometimes.

However, as for NFS statelessness, it's not totally true.
For an NFS client to be able to continue operating after the server have 
rebooted, the server must not have changed its hardware configuration, 
or else the device handles that the NFS client holds becomes invalid.

	Johnny