[Info-vax] Nice printers for OpenVMS?

[Richard B. Gilbert]

On 8/8/2012 9:12 AM, Bob Koehler wrote:
> In article <jvrp91$j9h$1 at news.albasani.net>, Jan-Erik Soderholm <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> writes:
>>
>> Wasn't all/most of those doing the lately shootings "law abiding
>> citizens" ? Well, before the shooting that is. Handguns are just as
>> bad no matter whos the hand is holding it, of course.
>
>     Don't know about the Sihk temple shooter, yet, but others were under
>     care that in some states would have made them ineligible for gun
>     ownership.
>
>     Of course, those states are populated by bleeding heart liberals, so
>     the shooter can get around the laws by moving to a gun toting red
>     state.
>
>     I do believe the Second Amandment protects individual's right to own
>     guns.  I do not believe it protects nuts with guns.
>

How do you tell the difference?  Who decides who is "nuts"?  Is it the 
guy/girl with the gun?  There are places where I wouldn't want go 
without a gun; e.g. Camden, NJ.  Forty years, or so, ago, it was a 
reasonable thing to drive from Princeton, NJ to Camden, NJ to visit the 
Sears & Roebuck store there.  Today, you would be risking your life!

Camden is either the murder capital of the U.S. or the runner up!
Sears moved out of Camden many years ago.  So did anyone else who was 
able to do so. Now the only reason to go to Camden is to use the bridge
to Pennsylvania or to use the facilities of Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital
which is, or was, a first class hospital.

I think that cities, as we now know them, do not satisfy our needs for 
territory; that piece of ground that I call MINE!  You have young men
in the cities, patrolling and defending a one hundred foot stretch of 
sidewalk!  It's all they have!