[Info-vax] HP wins Oracle Itanium case
David Froble
davef at tsoft-inc.com
Fri Aug 24 12:10:35 EDT 2012
Bob Koehler wrote:
> In article <k15u6t$473$1 at dont-email.me>, David Froble <davef at tsoft-inc.com> writes:
>> After discussing the issue for a while, and forcing myself to look at it
>> in detail, I'd object with the claim that RMS is part of the file system.
>
> The XQP, or ACP, deals with the external views of files in the file
> system. In implementing the ODS Files-11 structure it tracks
> physical locations, ownership, protections, ...
>
> RMS deals the the internal views of files in the file system. It
> tracks records, indices, byte streams, and the aspects of meta data
> vs. user data.
>
> Having a Files-11 ODS without RMS is like viewing all files as a
> stream of blocks.
>
Well, yeah, that's my point.
The file system presents the files, "stream of blocks", if you like that
description, but I don't, to whatever needs the files.
A database system presents the data to the user / programmer. RMS is
just another database. It's far from the only one. It's just the one
that comes bundled with VMS.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list