[Info-vax] DEC server monitoring and alerting

[Johnny Billquist]

On 2012-05-16 07.58, Rich Jordan wrote:
> On May 16, 9:04 am, koeh... at eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob
> Koehler) wrote:
>> In article<fff401b5-a37e-4f10-820a-ca7e2dd75... at l5g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>, John Wallace<johnwalla... at yahoo.co.uk>  writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>> There are lots of other options too, given more info on your actual
>>> interests. TSM, as suggested by Henry, is a good one which *should*
>>> work on a DECserver 100.
>>
>>     Well, TSM should work on any product described as a "terminal server"
>>     that comes under the category DECserver.  But without more
>>     information from the OP I can't even tell which protocol is important
>>     to him.
>>
>>     IIRC, DECserver 100 only supported LAT, but later models supported
>>     TCP/IP, and it's possible that only TCP/IP is important to the OP.
>>
>>     Meanwhile, programming something in DCL is probably unreasonable,
>>     but there are likely to be DCL commands that can get close enough.
>>     And the OP expressed an interest in storing something in a file
>>     without giving a clear concept of what data and how it would be used.
>
> DECserver 100 and 200 (and I think 250) were LAT only.  90 and 90L are
> also LAT only and with restricted management (menu based).  DECserver
> 300 and 90TL supported basic TCPIP, and 700/900 series plus 90M and 90M
> + had basic TCPIP and (in some units optional, others standard) DNAS,
> which provided much more capability.   I'm not sure about the various
> chassis based 5xx series units; we never saw or worked with them.
>
> We still have several 90M/90m+ units with DNAS and a couple of 700s in
> regular use.

No. DS300 are also LAT only.
I have one (or two).

	Johnny