[Info-vax] DEC server monitoring and alerting

[Rich Jordan]

On May 16, 10:40 am, Johnny Billquist <b... at softjar.se> wrote:
> On 2012-05-16 07.58, Rich Jordan wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 16, 9:04 am, koeh... at eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob
> > Koehler) wrote:
> >> In article<fff401b5-a37e-4f10-820a-ca7e2dd75... at l5g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>, John Wallace<johnwalla... at yahoo.co.uk>  writes:
>
> >>> There are lots of other options too, given more info on your actual
> >>> interests. TSM, as suggested by Henry, is a good one which *should*
> >>> work on a DECserver 100.
>
> >>     Well, TSM should work on any product described as a "terminal server"
> >>     that comes under the category DECserver.  But without more
> >>     information from the OP I can't even tell which protocol is important
> >>     to him.
>
> >>     IIRC, DECserver 100 only supported LAT, but later models supported
> >>     TCP/IP, and it's possible that only TCP/IP is important to the OP.
>
> >>     Meanwhile, programming something in DCL is probably unreasonable,
> >>     but there are likely to be DCL commands that can get close enough.
> >>     And the OP expressed an interest in storing something in a file
> >>     without giving a clear concept of what data and how it would be used.
>
> > DECserver 100 and 200 (and I think 250) were LAT only.  90 and 90L are
> > also LAT only and with restricted management (menu based).  DECserver
> > 300 and 90TL supported basic TCPIP, and 700/900 series plus 90M and 90M
> > + had basic TCPIP and (in some units optional, others standard) DNAS,
> > which provided much more capability.   I'm not sure about the various
> > chassis based 5xx series units; we never saw or worked with them.
>
> > We still have several 90M/90m+ units with DNAS and a couple of 700s in
> > regular use.
>
> No. DS300 are also LAT only.
> I have one (or two).
>
>         Johnny

One of our customers still has one.  It can support basic telnet and
TCPIP operations; perhaps there were different software versions then.