[Info-vax] Oracle loses appeal in HP/Oracle Lawsuit

[Michael Kraemer]

Neil Rieck schrieb:

> Even still, 2B is not chump changed. 

Sure, but I was wondering about the inconsistency of intel's numbers.
Even $2B is just the absolute upper limit.
Only a fraction of BCS's revenue (the chip costs) will
actually go to intel.

> But perhaps we spoke (er, typed) too soon. 
> While searching this morning for the original article with arguments why 
 > "Intel would not terminate Itanium" which included the gross/net 
incomes,
> I stumbled across this article just published yesterday (Feb-13) titled:
> 
> Intel cuts back Itanium plans, raising questions about chip's future
> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9236768/Intel_cuts_back_Itanium_plans_raising_questions_about_chip_39_s_future

Where's JF when we need him for a comment?

> As Neil Young might have said, "I see the damage [is already] done"

But that song had a quite different context, iirc.