[Info-vax] OpenVMS x86-64 and RDB and DB's in general on OpenVMS
David Froble
davef at tsoft-inc.com
Mon Jun 29 20:55:25 EDT 2015
Stephen Hoffman wrote:
> On 2015-06-29 22:25:14 +0000, Jan-Erik Soderholm said:
>
>> David Froble skrev den 2015-06-29 18:37:
>>
>>> How you get to some subset of VMS users needing RDB, to "dead-end for
>>> VSI", is questionable. In your opinion, yes. But your opinion is
>>> not universal.
>>
>> I think there are enough VMS users that also needs/uses Rdb to make it
>> a dead-end for a VMS/x86 port without Rdb.
>
> Would the currently-entirely-hypothetical omission of Rdb hurt? Most
> definitely.
>
> But if I've got a choice of porting off of OpenVMS to another operating
> system and also porting off of Rdb to another database as part of the
> same project, or just porting databases, I would most definitely
> consider staying on OpenVMS and porting the data from Rdb to another
> local database. Some research and estimates of the effort involved
> would be entailed, as well as discussions around risk aversion and
> costs, obviously.
>
>
Now add to that mix a database product that made the DB port rather
trivial. Not saying such exists now, but, it could in the future.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list