[Info-vax] OpenVMS 7.3-2, Patch V26.0 -> sh mem/cache=(vol=*, topqio=2) -> EXE crashing
IanD
iloveopenvms at gmail.com
Tue Jun 30 11:14:11 EDT 2015
Just wondering if the brains trust can help me on this one
*Before anyone suggests raising a ticket with HP, these systems have no support contract - please don't shoot the messenger here, this is not my doing...
I have two systems, both running OpenVMS 7.3-2, with patch VMS732_UPDATE V26.0, that result in an EXE dump when the following command is executed
sh mem/cache=(vol=*,topqio=2)
It works with
sh mem/cache=(vol=*) or sh mem/cache=(vol=DSA1:) but as soon as I introduce any TOPQIO or TOPHIT, it goes belly up
One system is in a cluster and is the only system running V26 in that cluster, the others are 2 nodes are running V20.0 and they do not exhibit the EXE crash
The other system that is experiencing the EXE crashing is a standalone system, which has been through multiple upgrades over the years (well before my time), it was running V20 before the V26 patch was applied some months ago
Things in common on the systems where the EXE's crash:
- Both are running V26
- Both are on Charon
- something else I am not aware of (obviously)
I do not know if this issue occurred before the V26 update because this command was not something I tried before patching with V26, so it's either something amiss in V26 or perhaps Charon is a factor here or there is some weird and wonderful thing introduced in the patches between V20 and V26 that are outside the scope of V26 or ...
Here is the EXE crash if this provides more of a clue as to where it's breaking
>From the clustered system:
sh mem/cache=(vol=dsa20:,topqio)
System Memory Resources on 1-JUL-2015 00:55:01.03
Extended File Cache Top QIO File Statistics:
_DSA20: (DISK$QUORUMSYS), Caching mode is VIOC Compatible
%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=38, virtual address=100000000000001B, PC=0000000000012300, PS=00021D80
Improperly handled condition, image exit forced.
Signal arguments: Number = 0000000000000003
Name = 000000000000000C
0000000000046638
100000000000001B
Register dump:
R0 = 000000000000000C R1 = 0000000000000000 R2 = 0000000000012300
R3 = 0000000000021D80 R4 = 00000000000231D0 R5 = 0000000000000001
R6 = 0000000000000001 R7 = 000000007AEAF9A8 R8 = 00000000007810D2
R9 = 0000000000000400 R10 = 0000000000000100 R11 = 000000007AEAF538
R12 = 000000007AEAF438 R13 = 000000007AEAF9B8 R14 = 000000000001BB9C
R15 = 0000000000024838 R16 = 000000000000000C R17 = 0000000000000000
R18 = 000000007AEAF44D R19 = 0000000000000028 R20 = 0000000000000001
R21 = 000000007AEAF560 R22 = 0000000000000000 R23 = 0000000000000000
R24 = 00000000000000B1 R25 = 0000000000000001 R26 = 0000000000046638
R27 = 000000007B616F60 R28 = 100000000000001B R29 = 000000007AEAF410
SP = 000000007AEAF410 PC = 0000000000046638 PS = 100000000000001B
>From the standalone system:
sh mem/cache=(vol=dsa1:,topqio)
System Memory Resources on 1-JUL-2015 01:54:23.74
Extended File Cache Top QIO File Statistics:
_DSA1: (DISK$ISAACSYS1), Caching mode is VIOC Compatible
%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=38, virtual address=100000000000001B, PC=0000000000012300, PS=00021D80
Improperly handled condition, image exit forced.
Signal arguments: Number = 0000000000000003
Name = 000000000000000C
0000000000046638
100000000000001B
Register dump:
R0 = 000000000000000C R1 = 0000000000000000 R2 = 0000000000012300
R3 = 0000000000021D80 R4 = 00000000000231D0 R5 = 0000000000000001
R6 = 0000000000000001 R7 = 000000007AE0D9A8 R8 = 00000000007810D2
R9 = 0000000000000400 R10 = 0000000000000100 R11 = 000000007AE0D538
R12 = 000000007AE0D438 R13 = 000000007AE0D9B8 R14 = 000000000001BB9C
R15 = 0000000000024838 R16 = 000000000000000C R17 = 0000000000000000
R18 = 000000007AE0D44D R19 = 0000000000000028 R20 = 0000000000000001
R21 = 000000007AE0D560 R22 = 0000000000000000 R23 = 0000000000000000
R24 = 00000000000000B1 R25 = 0000000000000001 R26 = 0000000000046638
R27 = 000000007B606F60 R28 = 100000000000001B R29 = 000000007AE0D410
SP = 000000007AE0D410 PC = 0000000000046638 PS = 100000000000001B
They appear to be crashing at exactly the same point in the EXE? giving all the dumped information is identical
Rolling back the patch isn't going to happen nor be allowed in these environments
Ideas as to where to look, what further things to dig into, greatly welcomed :-)
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list