[Info-vax] TCPIP v5.7 eco5

[Carl Friedberg]

Simon, no I don't know for certain. I know this happens because "they" just
don't get the importance of configuration/patch management. Sigh

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Simon Clubley via Info-vax <
info-vax at rbnsn.com> wrote:

> On 2015-02-28, Carl Friedberg <frida.fried at gmail.com> wrote:
> > In my opinion, the fact is that a new patch will be issued with the same
> ID
> > as the defective one. That is not good software or configuration
> management
> > practice, and does provide interesting support scenarios. It's bad enough
> > when they pull patches without notice; but when they stuff it back out
> > there with the same ID, those of us who already applied the original
> patch
> > are left in the lurch. It has happened to me several times in the last 5
> > years.
> >
>
> Oh for goodness sake, not again. :-(
>
> I thought HP got well and truly roasted by everyone the last time they
> did that.
>
> Do you happen to know for sure they are reissuing it under the exact
> same ID without a suffix on the end ?
>
> Simon.
>
> --
> Simon Clubley, clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
> Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world
> _______________________________________________
> Info-vax mailing list
> Info-vax at rbnsn.com
> http://rbnsn.com/mailman/listinfo/info-vax_rbnsn.com
>