[Info-vax] PCI-X on VSI OpenVMS
Stephen Hoffman
seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid
Fri Sep 9 10:31:16 EDT 2016
On 2016-09-09 13:59:50 +0000, Dirk Munk said:
> Stephen Hoffman wrote:
>> On 2016-09-09 10:02:37 +0000, Dirk Munk said:
>>
>>> Really. I don't even know where to put those PCI and PCI-X adapters.
>>> The only new Itanium rack system that HPE is selling *and* is certified
>>> for VMS, is the RX2800. It doesn't have PCI or PCI-X slots........
>>>
>>> I wonder is there is any Itanium system with PCI or PCI-X slots,
>>> perhaps this list of adapters was copied from the HP Alpha quickspecs
>>> for VMS 8.4??
>>
>> There are (older) Itanium systems that are supported by VSI OpenVMS
>> releases that do have PCI-X slots. e.g. The rx2660 is supported by
>> VSI OpenVMS V8.4-2, and can have PCI-X slots.
>>
> Fine, that is in the best of VMS tradition. Never the less if we assume
> some one wants to set up a new VMS system, he will be very surprised to
> see ancient PCI adapters named fist, and more modern PCIe adapters
> later. If you want to proof that VMS is very much alive and a modern
> OS, this doesn't help.
Listing hardware support in QuickSpecs or SPD or whatever VSI calls
that is already an issue. That's a job for a database, not a
human-generated PDF. HPE SPOCK, though HPE has seemingly been
fragmenting that configuration support information. A database
particularly because the hardware support inevitably becomes — and
arguably already is — more complex than what the traditional
QuickSpecs/SPD/whatever can reasonably represent.
--
Pure Personal Opinion | HoffmanLabs LLC
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list