[Info-vax] Intel junk...Kernel-memory-leaking Intel processor design flaw forces Linux, Windows redesign

[DaveFroble]

Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
> Den 2018-01-09 kl. 14:16, skrev Tim Streater:
>> In article <p32eir$3r6$3 at news.albasani.net>, Jan-Erik Soderholm
>> <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Den 2018-01-09 kl. 10:58, skrev Tim Streater:
>>>> In article <WOT4C.274768$BH4.101809 at fx02.iad>, Wolf K
>>>> <wolfmac at sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2018-01-08 14:59, Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> If you run the gasoline engine on bio-fuels produced from plants
>>>>>> growing *today*, there is no issue with the C02 emissions.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a net addition to the CO2 load, because it costs energy 
>>>>> (ie, fuel) to produce the biofuel. That cost can be stated as the 
>>>>> proportion of the fuel needed to produce it. That is, how many 
>>>>> litres of some fuel does it take to produce 100 litres of the stuff?
>>>>
>>>> And how much land to produce the 100 litres each year every year? Or to
>>>> produce enough biofuel for one vehicle's annual driving?
>>>>
>>>
>>> What kind of "vehicle"? You can probably forget all those V8's...
>>>
>>> No, bio-fuel is not the only solution. There will be other fueld
>>> neededf and at the samre time another way to "build" our communities
>>> that does not need the amount of car travels as today.
>>>
>>> And bio-fuel is not only about growing stuff out on the fields, it
>>> is also gas produced from ordinary household waste.
>>
>> Biofuel is not a solution at all.
>>
> 
> So then, what is the solution to get rid of the fossil fuels?
> 
> 

Solar, thermal, wind, and for consistency, nuclear.

Hydrogen and oxygen reactions are rather eco friendly, though there are some 
nitrogen based products we could do without.


-- 
David Froble                       Tel: 724-529-0450
Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc.      E-Mail: davef at tsoft-inc.com
DFE Ultralights, Inc.
170 Grimplin Road
Vanderbilt, PA  15486